Tyciol31 January UTC. That is a pretty serious claim to make for it to be left so vague. I would like to see a mention of which "available studies" show that or at least see some resources cited for that statement. I think your numerous entries and admissions in this discussion make it abundantly clear where your interests lie Tyciol. I think you'd do well to stop ego-buffing yourself as a member of the self-appointed intelligensia and hope that you grow out of these interests before you get much older.
You are being watched. I don't remember enough specifics to properly cite this, but I've seen at least one study that shows this to be true - in New Zealand if I remember correctly.
Opinion ls series girls nude will
Also, there's a "sexual deviancy rehabilitation clinic" forgot the actual name nearby that the local courts order sex offenders to get therapy at, and I went in and took a look in the lobby once. I saw people as young as maybe 10 or 11 years old, and I was really confused until I read that New Zealand study.
I'm guessing some of those kids broke child pornography laws, or committed some other sex-related crime. Qwasty13 September UTC. I think this part of the article needs serious work. It actually has nothing to do with society's perception of child pornography. Instead, its a list of unverified exceptional cases where anti-child abuse laws have been criticised as taken to extremes.
As such, I think it violates the NPOV code. I wouldn't say its defending child pornography, but I question the motivations behind publishing this kind of information in such a one-sided way. The article says that the Ashcroft v.
Free Speech Coalition ruling allows for simulated child porn. But what about this: ? Sure he had real stuff on his computer, but he also got nailed for the mangas as well. Themself is not a word.
Naked and Afraid photos, including production stills, premiere photos and other event photos, publicity photos, behind-the-scenes, and more For nearly the entire history of film production, certain films have been banned by film censorship or review organizations for political or moral reasons or for Afghan woman with dreams of becoming doctor, loses job as midwife under Taliban rule. 'Don't trust the Taliban,' hundreds gather outside White House. Load
The correct word is themselvesand may be used as a generic singular in these instances. The following information is based on a story in the national Algemeen Dagblad newspaper in the Netherlands. It's all over the news in the Netherlands today.
I'm wondering if it should go into the article as the second sentence in the keywords para of the Commercial production and distribution section.
Remarkable phrase ls series girls nude opinion
There's no telling if anything will come of it, or how far it will go. Just dropping it off here for others to decide:.
AvB ? talk17 March UTC. Yeah, I was seduced and subsequently molested by Wikipedia back in the late 60's True story. Is it illegal for children to view child pornography? I get the impression it is reading through the talk page, in which case: is it illegal by laws saying "child porn is illegal, and that's it," or by specifying age-groups?
Is it legal for children to view porn at all? Could the answer be noted briefly in the article? It's relevant, seeing as teenagers do view the stuff. Njal29 April UTC.
I was molested at age 7 by a guy who had piles of ponography all over his house and a Nazi flag in his den. It was SICK, SICK, SICK, Dont come off and tell me its harmless as long as whatever. Normal Pornography, when in the hands of some asshole who is "infatuated with children" can cause him to do "EVIL" things that he might not have done otherwise.
Agree, the ls series girls nude your place
These asshole criminals should be "CASTRATED" while awake, "REAMED" and then sent to jail with tattos on thier heads that say "Child Molester!
wake up and see it! I think people should only have sex with people as old as them. Adult people who molest children are just as disgusting as old people who engage in sexual acts with young "consenting lol" people.
Cuzandor5 June UTC. Dear merlinus1 The only conection made from parents who abuse there kids either with pain or sex, is that it happened to them. amazing net is one of those stores owned but that stock company. And many people "read" porn mags, child rape is a small compared to the number of slut out there.
Ls series girls nude
FyiFoff 18 November EST. You need a CITATION that there's a stigma attached to child porn!? Can't somebody even write that lawnmowers cut grass without needing a citation? I was going to say something about that, the 'citation needed' really needs to be romoved.
Of course, because you are browsing Wikipedo judging by this discussion. Maybe Tyciol should set up a sub-site? I'm pretty sure that the "artist merit" of written materials isn't involved. Such texts are protected under "freedom of speech", right? It would be great if this article could explain this inconsistency.
Jailbait images are sexualized images of minors who are perceived to meet the definition of radiodelmolino.comit images can be differentiated from child pornography as Little Girls. Paraphilias message board, open discussion, and online support group. The Paraphilias Forum is now closed for new posts. It is against the Forum Rules to Yet they got a bunch of people in the usa at least plus to the naturalist nude stuff people in usa were charged same as like ahrdcore amterial. So I am curious did (Rated Start-class, Low-importance):
If virtual child porn per the statutory definition depictions of a minor, whether real or imaginary, engaged in a sexual act has supposedly been "proven" to contribute to the act of child sexual abuse, then why does text describing the very same acts of sexual exploitation with a minor not have a similar psycological effect?
Was some government-funded evaluation performed to determine if inducement to engage in a criminal activity is relieved when it is experienced in textual rather than visual form? What about auditory child pornography.
Is that protected by free speech? And what about a role-playing fantasies whereby an actor molests a blow-up doll of a child in a stageplay. That would appear to encourage child sexual abuse.
However, in this scenario there is technically no visual depiction of a minor involved because it is a live stageplay which itself has artistic merit. Is this also protected by free speech? Clearly, the U. law in this respect still has a lot of loopholes and inconsistencies that need to be remedied. Word selection in various sections reveals POV i. e "Most people are prosecuted MERELY" capitals added.
The content tend's to favour child pornography or at least a more liberal attitude to it quantitively. For example placing a few ancedotes about unreasonable reactions to the threat of child pornography would not be POV but almost the entire section on the social perception of child pornography is constituted by this.
Quote's given in the article are almost all the sorts of quotes that would be cited by those who are libertrain towards child pornography and those in favour of child pornography. And you've put back the frankly perplexing 'Example' section that I reverted, giving no reason why.
Naked Attraction photos, including production stills, premiere photos and other event photos, publicity photos, behind-the-scenes, and more 'Nude' gym short trend is making social media do a double-take From a distance, your eyes might be fooled into thinking someone is at the gym without clothes Child pornography in E.U. Since January 20, , Council Decision /68/JHA apply in all 25 member states. This decision define a "child" as a person under the age of
The comparisons between the Trang Bang photograph and the description of a pornographic image in that Utah case despite being inappropriately applied to this famous picture no matter what statement you're trying to make are POV. And for the last time, Wikipedia is not censored : there is no need to put a ridiculous 'warning' for the reader in an encyclopaedia. I'm going to remove this section again, and please don't put it back until you respond to these concerns.
Frivolous accusations of vandalism won't get you very far. Please review WP:OR. Your comparison of the child pornography standards to the Vietnamese photo is an original analysis, and hence inappropriate to Wikipedia.
First of all, I am not at all sure of the propriety of cutting and pasting a whole series of someone else's comments from personal user talk to the talk page of an article.
Darling in the franxx boys and Girls (nude pilots)
Of course I have no reason to mind my words being here. However, moving them was extraordinarily high-handed. Secondly, you are misleading in referring to the Dost factors while not listing them or providing background - and most of all in listing only four of the six, when mention of the other two would have immediately revealed the falseness of your comparison.
Thirdly, an acknowledged problem of standards of pornography discussed in the article is that their application to any given image is extremely subjective. Plainly you are making an evaluative judgment, and not a simple statement of fact. Your pretense otherwise is disingenuous. So, that's why I'm going to delete your POV OR again.
Seems ls series girls nude very
note: I apologize for marking this deletion as a minor edit - it was accidental. Firstly, everyone should obey the Three revert rule. Non-neutral point of view nor Original reseach are usually considered vandalism, so I don't see an exception to the three revert rule here. That said, I do think the section is original research, and have removed it. Courts are there to interpert the law, Wikipedia will report on their interpertation or the verifiable interpertation of expertsbut it is not up to us to decide if something meets a legal standard or not.
the Dost factors now have a decent treatment under the american section of the definitions, but perhaps it's worthy of it's own article?
Qwasty26 August UTC. I submit that original research is not something which is immediately obvious. So, which part is original research? I'm sure I could find a cite somewhere for each feature of the photo. Although governments rarely publish examples of what they consider to be child pornography, they sometimes provide detailed descriptions:.
The above description is for a photograph that cannot be published, however the 4 parts of the ruling can be illustrated by the Pulitzer prize -winning nude photograph of 9 year old Kim Phucin a peculiar pain-induced pose from injuries sustained during the Vietnam War.
The photo meets all 4 of the primary criteria used by the above court to determine whether an image is child pornography:. However, it should be noted that there are no known instances where the example photo has been officially considered child pornography. Since this discussion seems to have been fully explored, I have put an examples section back in, with a few very slight differences from the one shown above:.
The above description is for an illegal photograph that cannot be published. However, the 4 primary criteria used by the above court can be illustrated by the Pulitzer prize -winning nude photograph of 9 year old Kim Phucin a peculiar pain-induced pose from injuries sustained during the Vietnam War :. Trailers and Videos. See all 15 trailers and videos. Storyline Reality show where two strangers typically 1 male, 1female try to survive in the wild for 21 days, naked.
Refine All Photos By Type Still Frame Poster 4 Publicity 3 Event 2 Behind The Scenes 1. As to why the trend seems to be gaining popularity, the answer is simple, according to podcaster and celebrity fashion stylist Lindsey Evans. PAULINA PORIZKOVA POSTS MAKEUP-FREE, TOPLESS PIC WHILE ENJOYING BOOK. Celebrities like the Kardashians wear them to draw attention to their waists and butts. They definitely helped popularize the trend.
Nude bike shorts were listed as a hot fashion trend in December by Glowslyand again in July by Who What Wear - both of which are popular fashion and lifestyle publications.